186
Copyright Industry Wants To Apply Automated Blocking To The Internet’s Core Routers
(www.techdirt.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
186 points (99.5% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
55128 readers
693 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
With I2P each user is a node/router, so it does not rely on central nodes like Tor.
The only issue is it's slow, because most users don't allocate/have much bandwidth. Because of it's garlic routing (similar to Tor's onion routing) traffic is encrypted multiple times with multiple hops which also impacts throughput and latency.
The good thing is it's already suppported by qBittorrent (and BiglyBT), but setting it up is a manual process.
Also, qBittorrent doesn't support DHT over I2P yet, so it's necessary to use an i2p tracker like tracker2.postman.i2p.
As long as there's reasonable doubt that i2p is only used for piracy, it shouldn't get blocked. Similarly, Tor isn't only used for trading drugs, so it mustn't get blocked by democracies.