this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
171 points (97.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5397 readers
113 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asetru@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

These units do not push electricity into the grid unless their fail-saves are bypassed deliberately or fail catastrophically.

What are you talking about? Of course, energy that isn't used in the household is pushed back to the grid.

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

No, that’s not how it works in the general case. There are ways to setup a house to back power but it’s more complicated than just plugging it in.

Without proper safeties in place back flowing power to the grid becomes extremely dangerous for line technicians

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

On loss of power these inverters cut off within 20 ms or so. These are grid-tied, not insular (though with hacked firmware some of the models can be made insular-capable).

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On loss of power these inverters cut off within 20 ms or so.

20ms are exactly 1/50th of a second i.e. our grid frequency I think there's some more leeway. A whole oscillation being gone surely is suspicious and you want to shut off but that might take another millisecond or two.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

It's not a hard realtime cutoff spec, more a relais native actuation time. And from the behaviour I've seen they are ramping up slowly over minutes when the mains power is back, which seems a sensible thing to do.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe just look at how these inverters work before babbling about. These kits all come with standard off the shelf micro inverters, or rarely bigger string inverters, and will feed back up to 0,8wk into the grid if the energy is not used in the household. If the connection to the grid is lost they turn off within less than 50ms, making them completely safe for line technicians

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

and will feed back up to 0,8wk into the grid if the energy is not used in the household.

Even more precisely: If the energy isn't used on the exact phase the inverter is connected to. You might be simultaneously backfeeding 800W on one phase and draw 3000W from the grid for your kettle on another, pretty much every single installation (at least in Germany) is three-phase at the main breaker panel, then distributing (and three-phase for the stove). Good ole Ferraris meters only record the total sum (the wheel would turn at the speed of 2200W) but you're still using grid infrastructure which is one of the reasons why the installations have to be small: Because your utility can't bill you for grid usage.

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yes that’s the setup I was talking about. Not every grid in every country is setup for this though

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, that’s not how it works in the general case. There are ways to setup a house to back power but it’s more complicated than just plugging it in.

So what you're saying is that the general case is that it feeds back into the grid unless there are additional measures taken? But at the same time, it's not the general case? Huh?

Without proper safeties in place back flowing power to the grid becomes extremely dangerous for line technicians

Which is why, where I live, you have to register your devices with the utility company.

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

So what you're saying is that the general case is that it feeds back into the grid unless there are additional measures taken? But at the same time, it's not the general case?

I was saying the general case is that they aren’t tied to the grid, but that they could be setup to do so. I’m almost definitely wrong about how often these are tied to the grid though.

Which is why, where I live, you have to register your devices with the utility company.

Yup! I’d be shocked if a country didn’t make you inform your utility.