this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
378 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] figjam@midwest.social -5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh boy...what can possibly go wrong for documents where small minutiae like wording can make a huge difference.

[–] figjam@midwest.social -4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Creating legal documents, no. Reviewing legal documents for errors and inaccuracies totally.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

No, not that either. Unless you consider "use LLM to summarize the changes/errors/inaccuracies, then have a human read the whole thing again" an improvement over "just have a human read the whole thing".

Because LLM will do all these things:

  • point you toward issues
  • point you toward non-issues
  • not point you toward issues
  • change stuff even when "instructed" not to

If there is one thing you don't want to throw an LLM at without full, unbiased review, it's documents where the wording is legally binding. And if you have to do a full, unbiased review to begin with, where you can't even trust your tool to have highlighted all the important parts, you may as well not bother with the tool.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I really can't see this being done by any sane person. Why would you have a generator of text reviewing stuff (besides grammar)? Do you have any reference of some companies doing this, perhaps?

[–] figjam@midwest.social 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Its complex pattern matching and looking up existing case law online. This work has been outsourced to contracting companies for at least 7 years that I'm aware of. If it is something that can be documented in a run book for non professionals to do for twenty cents on the dollar then there is no reason it can't be done by a script for .002.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Aside from a handful of business that tried to do that and failed miserably, some of them failing in actual court, you mean?