this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
593 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2858 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

advertisers pay google when google tells them I watched an ad. not when I do it

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Even if you were right (which you aren't, ads don't work like that) it would change the fact you're stealing.

Does lying to yourself makes you feel less guilty?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not lying at all, and I won't be made to feel guilty for avoiding ads

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Deep down you are kinda guilty already, don't ya? You know what you are doing is wrong and yelling and strangers makes it easier...

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

no. telling people spreading misinformation they're wrong is cathartic to me

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever you need to tell yourself. Thieves don't get far in life, so reconsider someday.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

calling me names won't change the facts.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

If you steal, it's not a name, it's a definition.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago) (2 children)

So stealing is defined (in some states) as taking property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. So you're incorrect and commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com might be breaking YouTube's terms and condition not the law, and it's not theft.

If Google were paying the content creators anything even remotely resembling the kind of income from advertisers the content earns, I might have a shred of sympathy for them losing a tiny bit of advertising revenue if some user watches a video without watching the same three ads they've seen ten times already that day.

You're spending a lot of time and effort defending one of the richest corporations in the world. It's weird.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 4 minutes ago

PS: Has it occurred to you that I'm defending the workers that earn a living on the platform and are hurt by stealing?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 6 minutes ago
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

stealing has a specific definition. I'm not stealing.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 7 minutes ago

Taking things or using resources without paying the expected price. So theft. Tsk Tsk.