this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
86 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60035 readers
3913 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It could be comparing travel times/routes although those kinds of comparisons get complicated pretty quickly and can potentially incentivize dangerous driving. Ratings have the same issue, just pointing out there are other factors that could be used.

One of the main reasons that ratings are one of the worst methods of evaluating employees that interact with the public is that they tend to be impacted by people's unconscious racism and sexism.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

They absolutely look at routes. The thing is drivers run for multiple companies at once which is fine. The issue is when your Grub order sits in the back of the car for 50 minutes while they deliver 3 Uber orders across town.

I had a guy pick up an order 2 blocks from my house ( I was sick) then drove 20 minutes the opposite direction with my food to pick up at another place.

I'm on the drivers side, but they are bad apples.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You say unconscious. I say overt.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Overt certaintly happens, but when talking about averages for the population a lot of people judge others differently based on who they are and not necessarily what they do.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Yep, it happens even in populations where everyone explicitly condemns racism.

The way it happens is everyone has a baseline of what they'd consider fair treatment. They'll condemn people as racist if they treat someone below that baseline of fairness - that is the most egregious form of racism. However, they'll also do favours for people (i.e. treat them above the baseline) if they are perceived to be like them, while treating everyone dissimilar at the baseline - i.e. favours for pepole like them, and fairness for everyone else. While that means no one can point to an individual case where someone was obviously treated unfairly, statistically it means that the minorities get treated worse.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

and often subconsciously, for mild cases, it's so ingrained they don't even realize they're doing it.