this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
254 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60035 readers
3753 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm no encryption expert, but wouldn't a backdoor of any kind be inevitably exploited by a malicious actor?

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

On the first day it was released to the public.

The encryption specialists at universities knew about the eliptic curve backdoor before it was implemented, and kept recommending that it not be.

Remember that if the police can read your stuff, so can foreign interests, industrial spies, organized crime and militants of large scale political movements.

Besides which here in the States, law enforcement is notorious for abusing their access to technology to bypass protections of the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, often relying on getting a warrant post hoc or lying to establish probable cause.

And usually the judges don't mind.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Can you cite me some specific examples? I would love to do aome further reading

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

Go onto Techdirt ( here ) and check Tim Cushing's blog. His beat is the abuse and corruption of our justice system. The latest issue I recall was using drones to peek into fenced backyards, into windows and deep across property lines, all without a warrant or probable cause.

During the 2010s IMSI spoofers were being used but the Stingray corporation required precincts sign an NDE so parallel reconstruction (creating an alternative plausible path of investigation to lead to the same discovery of evidence) was the norm. Eventually defense lawyers learned to press the issue, as even FBI would drop cases before admitting they used IMSI catchers to spy on where a suspect's phone was.

One of my bigger beefs is the misuse of detection dogs, which have up to a ~90% false positive rate, called Probable Cause on Four Legs it's known that most departments prefer trick-pony dogs who just signal a lot, in contrast to dogs who can actually detect stuff.

Interestingly, there is a subset of the K9 sector who train and handle detection dogs (which are still legitimately used, say to detect explosives in long lines of luggage at airports), and thanks to the common use of dogs to force a search, the public has been losing confidence in them, and courts who believe dog searches are for real.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

often relying on getting a warrant post hoc or lying to establish probable cause.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction

Here's a whole ass Wikipedia article on the very subject, because it's been so widespread for so long it has a fucking name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemisphere_Project

Here's a Wikipedia article on the mass surveillance by the DEA, which is where the data used for parallel construction was sourced.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805/

Here's a good example from the first Wikipedia article about how the Feds pass signals intelligence to local law enforcement so they can start cases and claim they found the initial evidence some other way than illegal mass surveillance.

For more history about attempts to install backdoors, see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

That's a wicked response. Thanks big!!

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

There’s just so many examples

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

Also, Greece had a national scandal where their phone system had legal backdoors added for wiretap orders, and someone broke in and published the confidential phone calls of politicians using the same system. The US is now dealing with a similar attack.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 0 points 17 hours ago

That's so fuckered up, what's wrong with people these days?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, but politicians and police keep fantasizing about a magical crypto-backdoor that only they can use, no matter how many times people explain this to them or how many times they get burned.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Frankly a person with such persistence trying to get a tool they never justly need should get punched in the face until they get smarter.

I mean, there already are laws about what should be surrendered to them in legal proceedings and how. That's not impeded by any encryption. That everybody has right to remain silent is already a rule, encryption just reaffirms it with math.

What they are trying to create is a tool for illegally violating people without being detected, thus not causing outrage and not having to justify it.

It's literally an unprecedented penetration of government structures and agencies and political groups by criminals who want to use those organizations to spy after others. By thieves. They should all be found and put in jail.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

u/floofloof is speaking sarcastically above, I believe.