Memes

45887 readers

1150 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

sexy_peach@feddit.de

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

473

Voting for the lesser evil is still evil (feddit.uk)

submitted 5 days ago by robinoberg@feddit.uk to c/memes@lemmy.ml

308 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Advocating voting for a lesser evil could be considered harmful, though.

Why?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because it suggests that it's sufficient for progressive change.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think it does.

Don't get me wrong. I know people who want to believe voting is all that is necessary for progressive change, but they are wrong.

Edit: How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it's sufficient for progressive change?

I said advocatingy for voting...

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ok how does advocating for voting for the lesser evil suggest that voting for the lesser evil is sufficient for progressive change? Is that better?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It suggests that people need to vote for progressive change and that congludes their options to enact power on the system.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that makes some sense. But you could just tell people that voting for the lesser evil alone is not enough, you also need to organize. I feel like that is pretty clear. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.