this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Rant

273 readers
24 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org
22
I don't want to have tons of subscriptions to read interesting news (reddthat.com)
submitted 3 days ago by DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com to c/rant@lemmy.sdf.org
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I understand that effective journalism costs money to produce, proficient journalists should get and will go where they are paid, and sites need funds to maintain their operations. All that makes sense. However, I don't read one website I use Lemmy and internet searches to find news I'm interested in reading. I maybe go to the same paywalled news site twice a week at most, but rarely if ever quarce a month. It would make no sense for me to have a subscription to any paywalled news site even if I wanted to spend money. I have no option other than to use proxies, assume the article from others' comments, or just read the title.

The internet news media system sucks, but I don't see a solution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Your local library may have a digital subscription to newspapers, though the coverage may be delayed a day or two.

Also, pbs, npr etc do a lot of daily reporting for free.

If you're lamenting that the best journalists don't let you have the biggest news on demand, well yeah, if you could just buy the biggest/greatest hits in terms of clicks etc, the journalists (and the news ecosystem) might be in serious trouble.