this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
761 points (98.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12543 readers
1088 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The skit that "missed the mark" occurred in a break in play during the second quarter of Charlotte's game against the Philadelphia 76ers on Monday. The child was brought onto the court with Hugo, the Hornets' mascot, dressed as Santa Claus. After a letter to Santa requesting a PS5 was read out loud, a cheerleader came out with a bag containing the video game console.

The young fan was visibly overjoyed as he received the pricy gift. However, according to an online acquaintance, he was less happy when the cameras turned off and a Hornets staffer took it away, replacing it with a jersey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think I know where they could have gotten the idea.

In re-runs of old gameshows, it's not unheard of for them to edit the clips to look like the prize is Insert Sponsor Here, when the prize is actually something different. You can really notice this on Kid's Gameshows when the prize is something like an Xbox 360 for a gameshow that took place in 2002. (When a PS2 would be fair more likely)

However that's for RE-RUNS of PRE-TAPED SHOWS, meaning the person who won the original prize got the original prize and original airings would have shown said prize. The only "change" would been purely for advertisement purposes only.

That's very different from "You're getting an all-expenses paid trip to the Bahamas!" and then backstage they say "And here's an old Terminator T-Shirt or something, the one we had in storage that doesn't have the custard stain."

Which is very much what this situation was.

They probably heard about this practice and assumed that they could give a fake prize that's sponsor friendly, and then the real prize is something far less extravagant. Which tells me that they did not run this by their lawyers.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Retro-editing to update products in reruns is an interesting and weird concept, but makes total sense given the perfection paranoia of marketers.