this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
483 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
5268 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pika@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wait musk is pulling a card from ~~Facebook~~ Meta's playbook? interesting

[–] chumbaz@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He’s been playing up the idea of “the everything app” and X/x.com for decades. It’s actually what he wanted PayPal to be before they kicked him out. Theil is the one that refocused X.com and rebranded to make PayPal be what PayPal is today.

[–] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/HOtgF3eCn-Y

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An app that does "everything" is like a restaurant that serves "everything." It's not going to do any single "thing" very well.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

isn't a web browser an everything app

[–] LegionEris@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah. It just gets you to all the places. That would be akin to calling a car an everything store. You get in the car to go places and do things, but the car isn't the place or thing. You can have a direct connection to a website or app that doesn't go through a browser. Likewise, you can directly call a business to connect and interact without a car. The browser is the vehicle. The internet is the street.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That was my point

[–] Colitas92@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, that is pretty much how WeChat works. It is mostly a glorified messenger and payment system (like current whatsapp), that they added a proprietary webbrowser with addons and storefronts on top (and wechat gets commission from said webpages and addons people access through them).
You could maybe get a similar experience in Android if you install Firefox, save a bunch of commercial websites as favorites, save another bunch of social media websites as favorites, add whatever addons there are (ublock origin for the win), and access stuff only through it.
Voilá, now you have an everything app.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

x.com would have been a great URL for the XCOM games!

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

huh, interesting the more you know. An app that is universal for all common things would be nice but, Twitter would need a MASSIVE overhaul to do anything like that. Facebook has a better chance of doing that just due to how broad it is(still wouldn't use it cause Facebook), twitter is far too limited for something like that

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A universal app means a monopoly. No. We don't need that.

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't be against multiple universal apps for Freedom of choice tbh. Like there's already matrix which is attempting to do something like that for chats with bridges, and the there's also beeper which uses the same framework iirc

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

multiple universal apps

multiple

universal

apps

¿???????

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not 100% sure where the confusion is coming from so I apologize in advance for the ignorance. Yea universal as in you can do everything there. I'm not sure how the term universal would mean there can only be one. It would be counter productive to the freedom of the internet to have it that way. I would prefer to be able to access everything from one app. Would save a buttload of space on my phone and would make things universally easier by having the same interface across everything. I would prefer it to not be twitter since the platform sucks, but I wouldn't be against something like that and thats the wonderfulness of the internet, you can have more than one service doing the same thing.

The term universal and distinct are not mutual, unless I misunderstood the definition of universal somewhere

A good example of this would be pideon, I used to use that as a service to be able to access XMPP, IRC, Skype (back in the day), and google chat. Universal app that could be used for all my social needs, without having a monopoly.