this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
162 points (94.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3518 readers
47 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
162
A "toothbrush length" naval gun for cheaps (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by gkanor@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dellyjonut@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it poorly worded? You refer to guns by their bore size.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If it confused a bunch of people, I'd say it's poorly worded. "A gun the length of a toothbrush" made me think of a small pistol not a cannon.

[–] starman2112@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's because british journalists are incredibly stupid. Industry standard is to refer to weapons by their bore–you don't call a Glock 19 a 185mm handgun, after all.