this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
1825 points (98.7% liked)
Lemmy.World Announcements
29077 readers
150 users here now
This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.
Follow us for server news ๐
Outages ๐ฅ
https://status.lemmy.world
For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.
Support e-mail
Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.
Report contact
- DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
- Email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported)
Donations ๐
If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.
If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us
Join the team
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I recall a certain amount of overhead in IPTables "allow only from" situations but I'm not sure whether it's enough to make a DDOS any kind of viable on a server in this configuration.
Do you happen to know how effective the strategy is?
If your origin servers IP is never revealed then all traffic goes through cloudflare regardless. Firewall restricting the IPs is just good practice since cloudflare is the only IP that is supposed to talk to that server anyway, but it's not a requirement.
I can see some overhead if you're maintaining a large blacklist, but I don't see it happening with a small whitelist and default inbound DROP
Oh absolutely, I agree with the best practice! I just didn't know the real world efficacy of dropping packets near the NIC to mitigate DDOS load. There is certainly a performance limit but where that limit exists has been nebulous for me.