this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
738 points (98.4% liked)

memes

10671 readers
1889 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Forester@yiffit.net 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's not correct, there was a correction from the '30s to the '60s. It's just we stopped caring in the 60s.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah there was a correction but not one big enough to not call America gilded. The civil rights movement was a step forward but not everyone took that step willingly and some harbored resentment.

That's what gilded means. It's fake. Looks nice on the surface then you see the details.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They were talking about before the Civil Rights movement, FDR's New Deal and stronger unions from the 30s-50s brought economic inequality way down. It started to go up again after that, and the current out of control situation really began in the 80s with Reagan's awful tax policies that we're still facing the consequences of

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They're only awful policies for 99% of the population. Their amazing policies for the 1%.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have a very interesting definition. I'm not going to call it incorrect but I will call it based.

https://youtu.be/HCBEi59DaHw

[–] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that why it was called the gilded age? The point was that it looked superficially great but hid a ton of inequality and problems underneath. It was taken from a Mark Twain quote iirc

[–] Forester@yiffit.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It didn't look superficially great though. There were people and estates that looked and were fabulously wealthy. But in the context of the country just coming out of reconstruction.... It's not really so much that things were terrible and getting worse. It's that things were terrible. Got better and then stagnated. Instead of the entire country developing economically in equal measures a select few entities were sucking up all of the resources.

To put it another way in the year 2024 our policies are very heavily driven by the Reaganomics policies of the 1980s. Just like the early 1900s were very heavily driven by the end of the civil war reconstruction Policies knock on effects.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not that people stopped caring. It's more that people got fairly comfortable, and the greedy fucks at the top never stopped trying to hoard all of the money and power. So while most people had stopped fighting for better conditions, since conditions got pretty comfortable for a lot of people, the misers were actively working for decades to undermine all of society for their own selfish benefit. After decades of incremental enshitification, it has once again risen to a level where it can no longer be ignored. People have always cared about their own welfare, but they had their QOL slowly stolen while taking a much deserved breather.