this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
142 points (99.3% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
55056 readers
154 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
DNS exists so you don't have to learn a bunch of IP addresses. Changing to ipv6 doesn't fix that.
But dns also for dynamic ip. See DynDNS or load-leveling algorithm for choosing CDN in proximity. ipv6 fix that.
That doesn't get rid of the need for DNS. And ipv6 won't get rid of the need to load balance using dns.
Why not? If ip + domain in /etc/hosts and ip not change, what need dns for?
Also can load balance by http 302 redirect if server overloaded. Maybe not as good, but should work?
Because 99.9% of people are not going to maintain a hosts file, and don't even know it exists. Not to mention you'd have to already know the IP of the sites you wanted to visit.
You're basically arguing that phone books are a bad thing because people can just keep an address book.
99.9% of people not use piracy website that will be dns poison. And those website probably start insert guide for /etc/hosts on front page like did for alternative dns.
Not say dns is bad. Just search for solution for dns poison.
And can know ip from dns before poison or from megathread.