this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
1095 points (97.2% liked)

memes

10671 readers
2796 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And in return, YouTube serves video and pays creators.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

pays creators

Not enough. Otherwise creators would not need to include their own ads which Premium users can’t hide.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not possible to pay enough to overcome human greed.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not to money junkies it isn't, but to people with a healthy senses of empathy it would be.

[–] gex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Premium users can jump ahead to "the next part of the video most users fast forward to", which are sponsored segments most of the time

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6308116?hl=en#zippy=%2Cwatch-videos-without-ads%2Cjump-ahead

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Lol Premium users pay for sponsorblock

I know this feature and use it when I’m watching on the phone. But so far it’s not available on the Apple TV app.

[–] DoeJohn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

would not need to include

Yeah, I bet people like MKBHD are barely surviving without sponsors!

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, get the big ones out as an example…

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Yea but it proves the point that you might as well take sponsors on top of whatever YouTube pays you

[–] DoeJohn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Of course. You said YouTube doesn't pay enough, so I'm proving you that no amount of money will ever be "enough" for some people. I wouldn't expect creators to just reject lucrative deals with sponsors because "they already have enough money from youtube".

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if it was enough, they would not leave money on the table.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which is still bullshit, Youtube Premium payers should not have to sit through that crap. Pirates with sponsor block have a better experience than paying suckers

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Piracy is a service problem...

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

There was a piracy poll in Norway, and a significant percentage of people said they would stop pirating if streaming was cheaper.