this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
802 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
802
Car brain energy. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Places that require a car for the drive thru are just leaving money on the table. I never understood that.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is entirely a corpo policy to limit liability. The idea, as far as I understand it, is that they want to prevent people from standing in the drive thru since that carries the risk of them being hit/injured/harmed while waiting in the line.

Its literally a problem because corpos don't want to get sued for an idiot driver gassing their way through a drive thru and mowing someone down.

Honestly, given how lawsuit happy many people are, I'm not terribly surprised. What does surprise me though, is that they don't have a walk-up window in a pedestrian safe area. I guess the logic is that the pedestrians can just go inside, but when the drive thru is open late, after the dining/walk in area closes, you end up with stupid situations like the OP.

I hate corpos.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think another part of it is they dont want "undesirables" entering the store. In my area the main entrance on the main road to a drug store is never open it is always locked. There 5 or 6 cashiers/checks outs on that side of the store that sit empty because they can't manage security for 2 entrances. Instead the rear, car parking lot entrance is the only option. The rear entrance has only 1 cashier

If you walk to the store from the south you literally have to walk nearly an extra block to get all the way around to the back of the store. The same goes for a small mall nearby, some of the entrances are locked for just no reason at all which adds a lot to travel time, especially if you have mobility issues.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This can definitely be a factor. Depending on the area and other demographics.

Personally, I live in what appears to be a mostly "white" small community in a fairly rural town. Population is less than 10k. The local fast food chain closes the dining room before the drive thru here too. We're too small of a community to have undesirables, and we're 15 minutes from anywhere, and 20-30 minutes from any somewhat major city.

They still do it. The brain rot of corpos has no end.

They'll be cruel to people who need accommodation because they can. They're horrible people.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'd assume they want to discriminate against people who are too poor to have cars because they think those people are more likely to be difficult customers, and since most people have cars they don't lose much business by doing this.

[–] sparkle@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wealthier people are by far the most difficult customers. They think they're entitled to everything because they're "rich" and "above" wage slaves, so they get pissy and aggressive the moment something doesn't go their way (and sometimes they'll just make a ruckus for fun). Source: I worked in a few fast food restaurants in the south before

It was crazy for me working at a mexican restaurant and the only people who got argumentative over the $13 for a burrito with just 4 oz of meat (total rip-off) were the ones who could definitely afford it, while the poorer people just accepted it. And the wealthy people always came in again (usually regulars) and expected it to be more every time.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When i worked on pools, the millionaire with a massive "cottage" would argue over $5 worth of product or try to get a refund for unused chemicals the end of the season.

The family thats working hard to make ends meet barely ever argued. Our prices were fair and they want their kids to be able to enjoy their pool. They were always way more appreciative to the employees doing the work and were more likely to offer water, beer, and snacks.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Drive troughs have a very high turnover rate, don't need space for tables or employees cleanup, etc.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But then why imply that you aren't allowed to visit the drive through by foot?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Dont want people in the parking lot? Don't want humans holding up cars?