Itch doesn't appear interested in suing unfortunately. I want them to, not because I'm bloodthirsty, but to set precedent that this wreckless use of AI content moderation isn't OK. I can imagine Disney and Nintendo following this.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I mean... a little bloodthirst is okay.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This isn't wreckless. In fact, it's fairly wrecking.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Commenting so that I remember to look it up, is reckfull a word? Or maybe reckful, knowing how English is weird about double 'l"s?

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Chatgpt answer:

Yes, "reckful" is a real word, although it is rarely used in modern English. It means being thoughtful, careful, or prudent, essentially the opposite of "reckless." It comes from the same root as "reck," which means to care or pay attention to.

Examples of Usage:

In older texts, "reckful" might describe someone who is cautious or considerate of consequences: "He was reckful in his approach, weighing every decision carefully."

Why It's Uncommon:

"Reckless" became the dominant term in English, and "reckful" fell out of common usage. Today, terms like "careful," "prudent," or "mindful" are more likely to be used in its place.

So while "reckful" is technically correct and would make sense in context, it might sound archaic or poetic to most modern English speakers.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

They really should because the law has already decided that AI isn't an independent entity, and is essentially just a computer program.

So whoever initiated the AI is ultimately responsible for its behavior, they can't claim the AI malfunctioned because they chose not to bother having any human oversight, they knew that this was always a possibility and still they took responsibility for it.