this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
49 points (90.2% liked)

Games

16949 readers
466 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
  1. It's free

  2. The gameplay is good.

  3. The characters are designed well

If Concord had done two of those things, it would have been fine instead they'd didn't even do one of them...

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Free" wouldn't have saved Concord. They had basically no interest in the game from the time it was revealed, and the open beta player numbers supported that. Putting a price tag on the game was an attempt to bleed out less profusely.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah concord was"free" during open beta and lost users. It was just unappealing all around

load more comments (3 replies)