this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
186 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

IIHS researchers analyzed pedestrian crashes to develop injury risk curves showing how speed affects crash outcomes. They found that the effect of crash speed on injury risk was magnified for vehicles with taller front ends. Compared with risk curves developed using crash data from Europe, where tall passenger vehicles are less common, risk curves for the U.S. show pedestrians here begin to suffer more serious injuries at lower speeds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Before anyone is like "of course, we already knew this"

Now it's proven with empirical data. This is what matters.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The issue isn't data, the issue is breaking the car culture. I've seen people nearly hit a pedestrian with right of way at a crosswalk while their car was turning right on red. Most of the time they freak out along the lines of "get out of the road, this is for cars." We've adopted a terrible attitude of the car driver is always right and the pedestrian is always wrong and that is the biggest thing that needs to change. We constantly accept dangerous designs that take pedestrians, drivers, and cyclists lives to save people literally SECONDS on their daily commute and whenever someone is hurt we blame the human factors instead of the designs of roads and cars.

We can throw as much data as we want, unfortunately it seems most drivers are on the side that seconds are more valuable than life.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd argue that in order to (help) break this insane car culture, you need empirical data to prove it. This to counter the "it's not really proven, there's no evidence, just feelings" crowd.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We have the data. In my area an ancient subway moves more people than the widest highway in north america. They fight tooth and nail to prevent any new rail projects and literally have to print new laws to keep building highways that only make congestion worse. In my opinion it is way more of a culuture war than a numbers war. Many places, and even people, in north america will treat you as a second class citizen if you take transit but we bend over backwards to shave seconds off of car travel.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hello Torontonian. Fuck bills 212 and 197, eh?

Kingstonian.