Technology

37738 readers

424 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

198

The Internet Is Failing The Website Preservation Test (archive.ph)

submitted 1 year ago by Gork@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is something that keeps me worried at night. Unlike other historical artefacts like pottery, vellum writing, or stone tablets, information on the Internet can just blink into nonexistence when the server hosting it goes offline. This makes it difficult for future anthropologists who want to study our history and document the different Internet epochs. For my part, I always try to send any news article I see to an archival site (like archive.ph) to help collectively preserve our present so it can still be seen by others in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kool_newt@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism has no interest in preservation except where it is profitable. Thinking about the long-term future, archaeologist's success and acting on it is not profitiable.

[–] FuckFashMods@lib.lgbt 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not just capitalism lol

Preserving things costs money/resources/time. This happens in a lot of societies.

[–] kool_newt@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And a non-capitalist society could decide to invest resources into preservation even if it's not profitable.

[–] FuckFashMods@lib.lgbt 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So could a capitalist society?

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Could it? Yeah, sure it could, and in some cases it will, but only if someone up the chain thinks it's profitable. Profit motive should never dictate how archaeology is practiced.