this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
470 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
470
1979 (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
 

Today, from Amtrak's website:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The other difference is some routes get 2 trains a day and it probably cost $5k to go cross country

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

2 trains a day would be an improvement for many routes, a lot are 1 train a day or 3 trains a week.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah i didnt mean to make antrak sound good. Its a laughable grid even for 1979 and to not have evolved since then while lowering frequency and increasing fares its just a joke.