this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
227 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

44143 readers
1160 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Notepad++ - This piece of software is a very advanced form of Notepad. Fuck that basic Notepad shit that Windows or any other OS gives you. This one is all you'll ever need for basic note-taking needs. But it does a hell of a lot more. One thing I love about it is that, if for any reason I put my PC to sleep, it crashes, power outage, I can run this again and everything I've ever written and no matter how many tabs - it's all retained.

AIMP - The definitive media player that you'll ever need for just playing stuff (music only, sorry if I mislead those thinking it can do video). Winamp and all the other software are just around for nostalgia (though Winamp has it's uses where you need it to play specific formats like video game music such as SNES with .SPC). One feature that attracted me to it was, it used to infuriate me when I am playing something and something crashes in any other media player. And you boot up that media player and you have to play your playlist all over again or that song from the beginning.

Not AIMP, if I accidentally close it, crash or whatever, I can bring it back up and it'll have the song or whatever on Pause so I can resume. Why isn't shit like this more implemented in software?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] everett@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"Free, efficient, no bullshit" is kind of the default for Linux software.

[โ€“] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

not unless you count UX as partof the "efficiency". A lot of oss software has top-notch functionality, but horrible ux

Yeah that front still needs improvement, but I will say things have gotten a lot better, especially in the past 5 years. Regardless of personal opinion on their approaches, projects like GNOME, Inkscape, GIMP, KDE (sort of, the settings app is still confusing as hell), even Blender's recent UI updates have been pretty solid. There's still a lot of room to improve though, and plenty of older software still hasn't seen much of its UX addressed.

[โ€“] verdigris@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think this is generally true at a higher rate than for any other software. Multi-billion dollar companies will have more polished UX, but step outside of the major flagship apps and things quickly degrade. Even the best in the business have plenty of problems, you can't design a perfect UX that will please all users.

[โ€“] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

I did consider posting a screenshot of just all the applications on my PC... ๐Ÿ™ƒ

But yeah, not much OP can do with hundreds of recommendations that don't work on their OS.