Privacy

32506 readers

1213 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is Google Chrome sandboxed by default on Linux? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 weeks ago by yourFanatic@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I already know that it's spyware but in the case that I need to use it for work and school on my Linux laptop, do I need to worry about configuring something so that it won't have access to my whole system like it does on Windows? I'm on ZorinOS/Ubuntu. Thanks in advance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] piracysails@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would suggest a jump from Ubuntu to qubes?

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Afaik Qubes runs all software in containers,
which isolates them from each other,
which is great for privacy.

However, OP only asked for Chrome,
and I assume the jump to Qubes might be too big.

To only isolate Chrome,
I'd recommend a Flatpak instead.

Or even better Ungoogled-Chromium.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, I just figured that a portable version of an isolated OS would be a decent alternative. Bit you're right maybe a bit too much