this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
175 points (91.9% liked)

Open Source

31679 readers
813 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would like to introduce you lovely OpenSource Lovers to a GIT-Alternative called FOSSIL that I also stumbled upon because of this Blog. It's basically opensource Github-in-a-box which means it's an SCM with:

  • Bug-tracker
  • Ticketting-system
  • Forum
  • Wiki-system
  • even a Chat-functionality
  • Has built-in GUI
  • Also has a Web-Server
  • Self-Hostable like Gitea/Forgejo

& the best part it's all in ONE STANDALONE FILE!!! which is extremely lightweight which you can copy to your $PATH & works even in crappy internet. how cool is that!!

However this tool supports a completely different style of development in FOSS called the "Cathedral-Style" whereas GIT suports a "Bazaar-Style" The person behind Fossil is the creator of SQLite, Dr.Richard Hipp & they even made other projects to support Fossil like a PIC-Like language called PikChr Well just in case; here's a list of difference between Git vs Fossil & guess what!! they even have a hosting service called CHISEL

Listen; Just check it out & use it for fun in your spare time even with the flaws it has (& Try out Darcs & Pijul as well)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

fossil is made by the sqlite devs, for development of sqlite. this is not some amateur operation.

also, it's by the sqlite people, so expect the code to be... odd.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

& The code behind Linux isn't ? People back then did some REAL sorcery with coding

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

back then? both codebases are fully modern. its more that sqlite uses a style that differs from the accepted norm quite a bit. that, and they don't accept contributions.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah it's the cathedral-style, Opensource but closed contributions as in no PRs

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Which is not really open now is it.

[–] Voytrekk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I would say its still open source. There is no requirement to be able to contribute modifications back. It is more about the availability of the code and what you can do with it.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

PRs didn't exist when open source was conceived.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You'll actually have to talk to the devs to be included in the project This VCS favours a more horizontal organization where the devs know each other (so A high-trust environment)

Please don't pretend as if OpenSource Devs don't constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

[–] Markaos@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago

Please don't pretend as if OpenSource Devs don't constantly complain about pesky PRs😅

I've seen much more complaints about people constantly demanding their specific annoyances to be fixed without ever submitting a single line of code. Maintainers are pretty much universally welcoming to code contributions

I soooo hope this does something funky with someone's Lemmy client