this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
417 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2136 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A YouGov poll revealed that 77% of Germans support banning social media for those under 16, similar to a new Australian law.

The survey found that 82% believe social media harms young people, citing harmful content and addiction.

In Australia, the law fines platforms up to AUD 49.5 million (€30.5M) for allowing under-16s to create accounts, with enforcement trials set before implementation next year. Critics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The True Problem, is that an actual-safe-space is required, for kids,

& that costs investment to produce, & to maintain.

We pay for kindergarten & schools to be safe-spaces, don't we?

Children's forming brains require healthy place, right?

Same is required for internet, for them.

So, a "walled garden" with wikipedia ( not the gore-centered stuff, & there seems to be some of that on there ), & TVTropes,

etc, is required for them to develop their minds healthy,

but the only "successful" walled-gardens were made with machiavellian intent, thus-far..

Apple's walled-garden, Microsoft's, AOL's, Google's, etc..

Nobody's done a not-for-profit edition for humanitarian reasons..

Big Tech'd sabotage it any way they could, in order to "prove" it "doesn't work"

( it'll never be seen in Google News, Facebook may well disappear all references to it, Apple wouldn't permit it on their platform's App Store, etc.. )

Exterminating-alternative is required when the stakes are world-possession, right?

NO competitor allowed, right??


Nobody's got the spine to create the required walled-garden which simultaneously gives children

  • access to meaningful friends

  • lots of learning opportunities & learning-means

  • gamefied learning, like projects-done-together on interesting-to-them subjects, with real accomplishings, like Science Fairs can be, irl

  • systematic stomping of abuse, predators, bullying, etc..

  • systematic training them in sane privacy-habits, device-health habits ( update your apps weekly! Reboot your device weekly! Use antivirus! )

  • systematically training all children in critical-thinking, dismantling ideology-programming as completely as possible, from the next-generation

etc.

& if anybody did have the spine, then it'd be force-disallowed by Big Tech.

Humankind waited too long to care, & now the bad-guys own the whole "game", it looks like, to me..

Human children never will know what honest, proper, supportive systematic-development through interesting challenges, & safe growing-up can be, because our-generations wouldn't do what was required, when we had leverage to be able to do it.

"fighting over crumbs" is all that's left, it looks like..

( lobbied "representatives" wouldn't allow world-integrity to violate their owners' interests, either, obviously.. )

Sorry for my bitterness, but I'm old.

_ /\ _