this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
645 points (97.6% liked)

196

16724 readers
2169 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 79 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the mental health field in particular, it's not unusual to list various not-a-diagnosis problems, stress factors, life circumstances type things, in the diagnosis list (see also: social determinants of health). E.g., a lot of my patients are homeless, and I also work with a lot of forensic patients, so their diagnosis lists often includes "homeless" or "legal problem". Which, obviously, aren't actual diagnoses, but it's often the best way to communicate to other members of the care team or future caregivers what the major factors are influencing a patient's health. For many people, "low income" is a major source of stress which drives or exacerbates their mental health problems, so it does make sense to include if the therapist thinks it's a factor.

Now, why it's the only item listed is another question entirely. It could be a quirk of whatever system they use for patients to view their records; with the electronic medical record system my employer uses, on some screens it only shows the first item in the diagnosis list, so if I put in "homeless" first then that's all I would see on some pages. The system isn't smart enough to know what's an actual diagnosis or not, so it relies on humans to put in the data correctly.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A couple years back I saw a tweet from a therapist saying that something like 90% of their patients would not need therapy if they made more money.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

turns out shit lives makes people feel like shit

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I could see that. I work at a psych hospital so it's a somewhat different patient population, but I'd bet that easily 10-20% of my patients would never end up here if they just ... had enough money. And most of the rest wouldn't be here as often.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Precarity does that. And yeah, the number of households in precarity (worried about rent, housing, health, food, etc.) is between 66% and 88% in the US.

Also there's intergenerational dysfunction ever since the industrial age and the rise of the nuclear family.

We're all mad here. 🐇🎩🫖

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 weeks ago