this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
417 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2156 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A YouGov poll revealed that 77% of Germans support banning social media for those under 16, similar to a new Australian law.

The survey found that 82% believe social media harms young people, citing harmful content and addiction.

In Australia, the law fines platforms up to AUD 49.5 million (€30.5M) for allowing under-16s to create accounts, with enforcement trials set before implementation next year. Critics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Force these shitters to make their products healthier for all age groups.

There's a lot of nuance here, but in general I agree. Hank (of vlogbrothers and SciShow fame), summed this problem up brilliantly. To paraphrase: social media is engagement based, not quality based. Upvote/like content on all you want, but misinformation, propaganda, rage bait, and doom-scrolling fodder will dominate any platform where the only valued metric is eyeball time.

So, the top-down solution would be to somehow strictly define how for-profit ranked media feeds and news aggregators are allowed to operate. Unintended consequences of such a law aside, I think it's possible to legally define a "well-behaved" social media site, but it won't be easy.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Begin with the "cherry-picking":

  • Disinformation gets cut out.

  • Fact-checking is protected-speech, not immediately-auto-deleted-because-it-harms-profitable-disinformation.

  • Ideological-prejudice gets cut out.

  • The major racisms: sex/gender racism, skin racism, class racism, & national racism, get stomped.

  • Correct & true journalism ( going to require independent ratings for individuals & organizations & for sub-branches-of-organizations ) gets automatically & consistently boosted.

You put those in-place, & MASSIVE improvement is inescapable.

The Problem(tm)??

Big Tech WON'T TOLERATE anything interfering with their highjacking of the world, with their asserting their claim to monarchic/polyarchic world rule.

EVER.


Try linking a Wikipedia article, to fact-check something, on yt..

Autodeleted!

Rabies is their means-of-gaining-possession-of-the-world, & NOTHING can be tolerated to interfere with their rabies/means.

No matter how many humans die, in which circumstances their platforms helped enforce.


For-profit-corporations are psychopaths, by default..

So long as we continue maintaining-otherwise, they continue winning..

until it's too late.

( & we don't get told when it is too late, either: that's movie-fantasy plot-point, not reality )

_ /\ _