this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
106 points (90.8% liked)

World News

32315 readers
606 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you honestly think western reporting on the war is honest?

Of all the gigs that journalists do, reporting on “war” is the toughest. Not because of the dangers – though these must not to be underestimated. But when reporting “war”, journalists face off against the world’s most powerful vested interests and compete with society’s deepest cultural mythologies.

At its best, the Fourth Estate uncovered the My Lai massacre, the Abu Ghraib scandal and the incestuous relations in the Bush era of retired military officers, the US Defence Department and the “defence” industry.

In this incarnation, the Fourth Estate frightened even Napoleon. In his words:

"Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets."

But the military’s “reality” is powerful, insidious and covert. It is seductive.

From https://independentaustralia.net/business/business-display/embedded-journalism-and-msm-war-propaganda,7045

And I, for one, am not speaking for Russia when I criticise peoples' happiness over the fact that a journalist has been killed in a war zone, just because they were Russian.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is 100 times more honest than Russia’s. You are clearly a Putin apologist.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure if this is deliberate misinterpretation or an unfortunate misunderstanding. Still, congratulations for completely missing my point.