this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
523 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12557 readers
395 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was trying to be clear I wasn't talking about Canada, which the article was about, and that my example was from the US,. Not saying it was literally true throughtout the the entire US.

Apparently I needed a full essay to avoid you reading meaning into things. Congrats, you win the internet.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So it was a simple misunderstanding but you just decided to defend it to the death and be a dick about it instead of explaining what you meant. I don't think I could roll my eyes harder if I tried.

Your comments didn't leave room for interpretation. You willy nilly gave out your own definitions and then literally googled "unhoused vs homeless" and threw the first article at me without even reading it. I'm surprised you can even see me from such a high horse. Please.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So it was a simple misunderstanding but you just decided to defend it to the death and be a dick about it instead of explaining what you meant

I did explain. You treated explaining it as moving goalposts because you wanted to be right.

You were so close to being self aware.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I can literally re read the conversation, you only started explaining with an attitude in the last comment.

The time to explain was before you gave made up definitions, not to mention your explanation is a cop out. An explanation doesn't come with salty sarcasm.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The time to explain was before you gave made up definitions

The time was before the misunderstanding...

Go touch grass.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The time was after I said it wasn't a synonym. You could have explained that you meant only for you in your own little world, instead you debated, gave me useless definitions and an even worse article to try to prove your point.

Maybe if the explanation came before the sarcasm, I wouldn't still be here explaining the situation.

Tell you what, this is my time to stop responding, that way, you can lie to yourself without me bothering you.