this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
768 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9802 readers
444 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

To be fair, the most efficient mode of transportation is cycling by far. I wonder if bike tires also contribute to this.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure they do but it will be way less.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The wear rate should be proportional to the weight of the system (car plus cargo and passsengers, bike plus cargo and riders), maybe with some correction factors for things that affect wear rate like knobbiness.

Since bikes weigh a couple orders of magnitude less on average, the amount of tire wear material should also be a couple orders of magnitude less.

Edit: other lemmyer said wear is proportional to weight to the 4th power and that may be correct. I vaguely recall that from school now that they mentioned it.

[–] sping@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

should be proportional to the weight of the system

It's that really true? Wear to the roads is proportional to the fourth power of axle weight so I would never have predicted a linear relationship.

[–] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exponential relationships are still proportional.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn't speed/acceleration affect it? If that is the case, that's another pro for bikes.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 weeks ago

Assuming the material properties and physical design of the two tire types is identical, maybe

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bikes cause thousands of times less damage to streets so I wouldn’t be surprised if they also wear less.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

Good point! Also much less weight.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 9 points 3 weeks ago

And the size of bike tires is way less than a car tire.