Arent you basically admitting "genderfluid" folks and those with sex dysohoria (for lack of better term) are not the same thing? Because if thats the case, why do you need to claim our community and iconography?

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. One is a people suffering from a horrific disorder in desperate need of effective medical care (transition) and the other is a fashion subculture. Muddying the waters by the latter has been politically disastrous for the former, but I'm not here to blame anyone because it all would've ended pretty badly thanks to the rightoids anyway.

Idk what you're on about regarding community and iconography, I was not aware gender fluid folks had any iconography specific to them nor do I remember claiming any.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

For some reason I assumed you were one of the genderfluid types, and was confused why you were so eager to claim a difference. Im one of those with said horrific medical condition. When I referred to iconography and community; I meant the trans community, flag, ect.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Oh yeah sure. No I'm a binary trans woman, I consider myself as suffering from sex dysphoria. Yeah idk why they claim it but I suppose all subculture stems from something real, punk in the 80s was a lot more about politics and a mindset than fashion.