this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
348 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39151 readers
1927 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] indomara@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

This is the image. (I use imagus or hover zoom which enlarges images all over the web upon hover)

There do appear to be civilian buildings with lights on in the image.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Combatants fight in civilian areas regularly.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Are you trying to say they're targeting it at the combatants and therefore it is OK to use it in a civilian area?

Because the photo just above makes it pretty obvious that it isn't a weapon that can be used in a targeted fashion.

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that’s legal under international humanitarian law. Being in a civilian area does not protect combatants from being targeted.

Proportionality applies, but that’s it. That means attacking combatants in a civilian area has to serve a military objective.

Is it not "use of air-delivered incendiary weapons against military targets in civilian areas" ? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons .