this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
86 points (89.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43973 readers
807 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Depending on how the next four years go I'm on the fence between Bush Jr. and Trump but I'd like to hear from you

Edit:

Top 10 suggestions so far (unordered):

  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Johnson
  • George W. Bush Jr
  • Ronald Reagan
  • Richard Nixon
  • James K. Polk
  • Woodrow Wilson
  • James Buchanan
  • Franklin Pierce
  • Donald J. Trump
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

While W. sucked in many ways, there is no way he is the worst. Off the top of my head I can easily think of four better contenders: Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan (both guilty of pro-slavery fuckery before the Civil War), Andrew Johnson (fought to let the Confederates off the hook after the war and opposed the 14th amendment), and Donald Trump (first president to be impeached twice, first to be convicted of a felony, and may be remembered by future historians as the spark that ignites the next Civil War).

[โ€“] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Andrew Jackson was also a bastard, especially for his treatment of natives. But I meant Johnson.

[โ€“] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know you did, I was just adding 1

Ah, gotcha. I misunderstood.

[โ€“] adarza@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

donvict ain't done yet, either. i think the damage and legacy he leaves behind, leaking out that giant diaper, will be the worst of the bunch.

[โ€“] einkorn@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Btw. question from Germany regarding Trumps Felony: I read that people convicted of a felony may not vote yet I also read that Trump cast his in Florida. Hoe does it actually work?

[โ€“] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 25 points 2 days ago

He was convicted in New York so Florida doesn't care.

[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

It is complicated because the rules are different in each state. Also, Trump was convicted in New York state but he resides and votes in Florida.

For out-of-state convictions, Florida defers to the other state's rules. New York would allow Trump to vote if he resided there because he is not currently in prison, so Trump can vote in Florida legally.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-felony-conviction-can-he-vote-b95e7b4c9158d999e8bc89b00fbda911

America doesn't have laws and isn't a functioning society.

[โ€“] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's rich and white so laws don't apply to him.

[โ€“] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

He is kinda orange

[โ€“] guy@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Question from another European about that, he's convicted but never got a sentence? Or did he and why in that case isn't he serving?

[โ€“] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sentencing was delayed until after Nov. 5th, and now it's been permanently delayed. I'm sure the conviction will be overturned at some point while he's in office

[โ€“] guy@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But have can you delay a sentence?
I mean it sounds so foreign to be told in court that "Yeah you're deemed guilty.. but we're telling you your punishment later. Maybe." instead of just BAM guilty, straight to jail it will be!

[โ€“] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sentencing isn't always done at the same time a verdict is given. Often a judge will take time to research the punishments available in the law. Sometimes they'll take advice on a person's character, and consider the level of remorse the convict has for the crimes.

There was a small public outcry last year when a celebrity was convicted of sex crimes, and other celebrities known for their work against sex trafficking wrote to the judge to ask for leniency. It made the news because famous people were involved, but it's a common occurrence.

He also wanted to wait to see what the Supreme Court would rule in the presidential immunity case, and I honestly can't blame the man for delaying indefinitely following the results of that. This judge and his family received a lot of death threats and harassment from Trump's supporters, but he also had to consider that Trump is immune to whatever crimes he chooses to commit in office.

[โ€“] 50MYT@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Non burgers here: I believe the sentencing for the conviction was delayed till after the election. And since that they have announced it has been delayed indefinitely.

[โ€“] guy@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

How is this even possible? Aren't sentences supposed to come with the verdict?
The punishment might come at a later date (it might in my country where you can be told that in 3 months you will serve jail time), but the sentence?