Technology

59656 readers

2786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

551

‘Thirsty’ ChatGPT uses four times more water than previously thought (www.thetimes.com)

submitted 3 days ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Writing a 100-word email using ChatGPT (GPT-4, latest model) consumes 1 x 500ml bottle of water It uses 140Wh of energy, enough for 7 full charges of an iPhone Pro Max

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's true, I don't know how large the models are that are being accessed in data centers. Although if the article's estimate is correct, it's sad that such excessively-demanding models are always being used for use-cases that could often be handled with much lower power usage.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago

This seems a big waste of energy if that 140Wh (504,000 joules) number is correct. That amount of energy is about 2,000 times what it would take to do a very similar thing on a home PC.

Writing a 100 word email with a 7B model would take my PC about 5 seconds, times an increased power use of 50 watts, so 250 joules.

I get that they might be using a much larger model, but the e-mail is not going to be 2,000 times better.