this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
14 points (76.9% liked)

30 Rock

471 readers
43 users here now

A community for the fans and critics of the show 30 Rock.

Discussion of the show, pictures from the show and anything else 30 Rock related.

Rules:

  1. All DubVee instance rules apply. See the sidebar at https://dubvee.org. Those are pretty comprehensive, so we don't really need to add much to those.
  2. No politics outside of what's referenced on the show. Let's leave that drama elsewhere since there's plenty of it.
  3. All posts must be 30 Rock related or adjacent. You dummies are awesome, so I don't think I've ever had to mod any posts for this, but codifying it for good measure.
  4. Less a rule and more of a guideline, but please try to provide alt text if your instance + client combination support it. If not, then please try to make an effort to provide a description of any image posts in the post body. Let's be an a11y when we can :)
  5. Don't make fun of people for misusing dated cultural references. Are we all cowabunga on this?
  6. No talking about Krang. It would be a waste of time to talk about Krang on ~~television~~ the internet.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MeatCat@dubvee.org
14
When someone explains to you how "baby" is their pet name for their significant other [captioned screencap] [animated] (feddit.org)
submitted 4 days ago by SatyrSack@feddit.org to c/30rock@dubvee.org
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

S2E15 "Cooter"

Full quality MP4:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] smokinliver@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would you be so kind as to enlighten me on the Concept of the Derridas hill?

Also I cuncur, daddy often means something completely different than dad and baby just seems to embody both meanings, but they are still to be distingished.

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Derrida has some interesting thoughts about how language takes meaning, and language's inability to directly access or reflect the "natural world," which it is meant to define as something beyond language itself. (Contradicting the structuralist point of view that language, although arbitrary, directly accesses and communicates something that itself transcends language by reflecting it via a natural and empirical system).

He posits that due to the ways human thoughts are formed and a network of meaning works, we can never use language to get to something more real "behind " the language (and if you think you have, that's just more language).

It ultimately destabilizes the relationship between any "signifier" (word) and "signified" (the thing that that word is supposed to represent or refer to) and has a ton of other social and cultural implications as well, but that's why "Of Grammatology" is a lot longer than a comment chain haha.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's interesting. I think Derrida had it right.

I feel like we've had a hint about that in database design for years - no matter how closely we think we have modeled the underlying reality to be tracked, we always eventually discover that we have not.

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Agreed! Which ultimately means the more confident you are that the system tracks, the farther you are from seeing the whole thing...