this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
18 points (76.5% liked)

Linux

8308 readers
97 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
18
Btrfs should've been Wayland (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 month ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think the problem with btrfs is that it entered the spotlight way to early. With Wayland there was time to work on a lot of the kinks before everyone started seriously switching.

On btrfs a bunch of people switched blindly and then lost data. This caused many to have a bad impression of btrfs. These days it is significantly better but because there was so much fear there is less attention paid to it and it is less widely used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wayland as a protocol that apps use to talk to the desktop. It doesn't use network at all really.

You need something like freeRDP for network access.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

@possiblylinux127 It is touted as a replacement for X-windows but the PRIMARY ADVANTAGE of X-windows is that you can run a program on one machine and display it on anther making Wayland completely useless in a networked context.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is not trying to be a one to one replacement. It is a totally different thing. You are wanting a motorcycle to replace your 2002 pickup truck.

Also X forwarding is broken for most stuff. It probably will work but it will run poorly and use lots of bandwidth. This is because there are layers and layers of work arounds to make modern hardware and software work on it. The X protocol was intended for mainframes in the 80's. It should've died long ago.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@possiblylinux127 I agree with you, it's not, but people here keep touting it as such and that is my issue. X-forwarding works great for me, I use it daily. I use it to access servers in my hosting service from my home office. I can fire up x2go if I need a remote console but most of the time a terminal and an app is quicker. I have no issues with lag, I'm sorry for those that do but it is just not a problem for me.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Do you use it over SSH?

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com -2 points 1 month ago

@possiblylinux127 It strikes me as weird someone down votes a simple statement of fact. I guess they have a problem with reality.