Enough Musk Spam

2215 readers

1 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

jordanpeterson@lemmy.world

an0nym0us@lemmy.dbzer0.com

157

Cyber-Security Experts Warn in Open Letter to Harris Election Was Hacked; Elon Musk is "guilty as fuck" (www.planetcritical.com)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Varyk@sh.itjust.works to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you have a better source than the state election results websites? If the premise of the whole argument was bullet votes, but the actually numbers are <2% instead of the claimed amount, what is the evidence?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

that is not "the premise of the whole argument"

read the meticulously sourced open letter based court verified testimony and documents.

pdf:

https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324.pdf

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Risk that something might have happened is a good enough reason for audits/recounts should be done in time to fix the election outcome, but they're not evidence that such hacks were successfully used. They just provide a mechanism that makes it possible.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

"provide a mechanism that makes it possible."

yup.

"a good enough reason for audits/recounts should be done in time to fix the election outcome"

yup.