this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
462 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2632 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ling’er, a 28-year-old transgender woman in China, won a record 60,000 yuan ($8,200 USD) in compensation after being subjected to involuntary electroshock conversion therapy at a hospital.

Her parents admitted her in 2022, opposing her gender identity, and she endured seven sessions over 97 days, causing lasting health issues.

The court ruled her personal rights were violated, marking the first legal victory for a trans person against such practices in China.

LGBTQ+ advocates hailed the decision, highlighting persistent challenges and legal grey areas surrounding conversion practices in the country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

it's a w for the trans people in china not a w for china

[–] parpol@programming.dev 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean sure, if you don't consider the people of china to be China, but we're going down semantics here.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Believe it or not, people who happen to be born in a place are not interchangeable with the authoritarian government that rules over them.

[–] parpol@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And government does not equal country. However both the goverment and the people are part of the country. When Chinese people win, the country wins. I said China, I.e. the country, not the government. If I had been talking about the government I would have said the CCP, which I am not trying to lift up in my comment. Fuck the CCP.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A country IS a government, it's just an organization represented by an arbitrary line on a map run by people who embrace violence to take power and resources from other people.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

yeah nah the people of china aren't the same thing as the judicial system of china

[–] parpol@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I never said the judicial system of China, I said China as in the country, people of China are a subset of China the country, therefore a Chinese people W is a China W. Can we stop this pointless conversation now?

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's impossible to have a conversation here without a half dozen people chiming in with "ackshually!

I, and every other neuro-normal person knew what you meant. I'd wager the commenter did too they just didn't know how to contribute because the social skills thing.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 days ago

you kinda implied it's a w by the judicial system of china when you made that first comment, otherwise it doesn't make much sense. A 'w' imo usually refers to good brought as a result of a party's active actions, and if you meant the people when you said china it really wouldn't make sense because it's mostly a dictatorship.

anyway I'm good to stop having the argument now, you don't have to reply