this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
67 points (95.9% liked)

Linux

48684 readers
404 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw plenty of efforts that aim to create a Linux distribution for non-enthusiasts, for people who just want to use their computers, and not care about the details - A Desktop for All on the GNOME blog, most recently. While I commend the effort, my own experience is that these efforts are futile, and start off from a fundamentally wrong premise: that people are willing (let alone wanting) to manage their own operating systems.

...

My family is using Linux because that’s the system I can maintain for them. Apart from my Dad, they never installed Linux, and never will. They don’t install software, they don’t upgrade, they don’t change settings either. All of that is something I do for them. And to do so effectively, I need a distribution I am familiar with, one that is also flexible enough to fine-tune for every member of the family, because they prefer fundamentally different things!

...

The common pattern between all these three is that neither of them maintains their own systems. I do. As such, how beginner friendly the distribution is, is meaningless. The users of the system don’t care, they’ll never see those parts. They’ll have a preconfigured system maintained by someone else, and that’s exactly what they want. To make this work, I’m using distributions I am familiar with. For my parents, that’s Debian, because I was a Debian person when their systems were installed. For my Wife, it is NixOS, because I’m a NixOS person now. For the Twins, it will likely be NixOS too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Installing Linux is definitely not something, the average computer user ever wants to do. The same goes for Windows. Unfortunately you can't just buy a Linux computer at your local electronics store. Until that changes, Linux will remain in a niche.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A regular reminder that ChromeOS is Linux. It's Linux you can buy from a bricks and mortar store, preconfigured for the average low-knowledge user, and with minimal to no maintenance overhead.

We enthusiasts obviously mostly hate it, but we're not its target audience. Its target audience (non-techies who mostly just like to use their phones) get on great with it.

People need to accept that any Linux distro made for mass market is going to look more or less like ChromeOS. There's nothing wrong with that, as long as traditional distros also continue to exist. But people need to get out of their heads that the "year of Linux on the desktop" looks like Ubuntu or Fedora or Mint. What it looks like is ChromeOS.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who hates ChromeOS? Never heard someone say that

[–] algernon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I don't like it. I don't hate it, but I don't like it. It's not flexible enough for what I - and my family - needs from an operating system.

[–] algernon@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Even if you could, it would change nearly nothing. The average computer user doesn't want to maintain their system either. They want a system they don't need to care about, or at worst, a system their friends & family can help with. Thus, the best way for a Linux enthusiast to help their family use Linux is to install and maintain it for them. For that, you need a general purpose distro you're familiar with, one that's easy to maintain remotely.

In other words, distros that target the average computer user are futile, because the target audience is not interested in neither installing, nor maintaining their systems.

(And this is what the linked blog post is about, in more words.)

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can buy it online tho

But yeah I would not advise Linux to people unless they are at least a PC gamer or have somebody like that in their life who can figure it it out when something happens

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But that goes for Windows as well.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True but people have some windows skills already

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Most people I know have zero Windows skills that wouldn't transfer to Linux. They can start a browser and click on a bookmark, but that's as far as it goes.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yup. No-one (non techie) needs a specific Linux distro. They're all easy to use for normie activities once installed.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

One big issue with retail computers coming with Linux is the kickbacks from the Windows ecosystem.

Things like AV trials and MS Office. I don't know if they break even or make a profit on all the bloatware from a Windows based sale.