What point have you raised? You bitched that there is too much diversity in games and used an LLM as proof. You mentioned a few games that had failed... So? Concord failed when overwatch was a success, with much more diversity. Hades, Persona, final fantasy rebirth, Hogwarts legacy ... Those are the games I played in the past few months with much more diversity than your examples, and successful. The likes of you claimed those games were doooooooooomed and then proceeded to shut up when people played them.

Then started telling that those who disagree with you sound like redditors and conservatives and send a Sanders video. How can you complain about red herrings if everything you do is rant and go on tangents?

You're also the one who somehow couldn't shake this conversation for your brain and had to come back. If that's not a sad fucking life, I don't know what is. What a sad, miserable existence you have you have, really.

I can't say I enjoyed this conversation even though at least I could laugh at you a bit.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

The original comment is still available. At no point did I complain about diversity in games, I complained about incompetence in games and lauded indie games. I see you're having a Quixotic moment and are arguing with a figment of your imagination. In fact, one could argue my point is the exact opposite, clumsy amateurish depictions of diversity do not do the importance of the topic justice. I understand not everyone can be as talented as Naughty Dog (Amy Henning is the GOAT) but at least something passable would be desirable. Keep fighting windmills.