this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
1171 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
1894 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cactopuses@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Just thinking at a high level, an infinite number of monkies should hypothetically almost instantly produce Shakespeare (or at least as quickly as they can type)

Conversely, 1 monkey would eventually produce it given infinity time.

[–] IHateReddit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

1 monkey would likely die before producing Shakespeare

[–] cactopuses@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

oh absolutely, this is purely a thought experiment of course.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

not if it’s an infinite monkey

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, an infinite amount would.

[–] ohshittheyknow@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So as weird as it sounds not all infinities are equal. For example there is an infinite set of odd numbers. That set will never include the number 2 though.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Two is the loneliest number?

[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

OK but what if we had one monkey typing away for every real number between zero and one?

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One monkey may never produce it even given infinite time. It could just produce an infinite string of the letter a and never change it's mind. That's less likely that it writing hamlet, or even many hamlets... But nonetheless, it could. In fact all of the infinite monkeys could do that. If you repeated the experiment and infinite number of times, it's likely that one of them will simple produce an infinite number of infinite strings of only the letter A. Or, idk, ASCII art.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the same type of criticism the paper made. The real intent behind the saying is given random output (where all outputs have nonzero probability) eventually you will create anything/everything.

Its a thought experiment around infinity, probability, and art.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I haven't read whatever paper this is talking about, but I imagine, it's looking at the saying in a more literal fashion for the sake of argument...

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's why a monkey is used in the thought experiment. Monkeys do think at a low level. As it goes insane over centuries of imprisonment in front of its jailer, it's likely going to try complex solutions to get out. Think of the hell infinity would really be for this monkey.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, and given infinite monkeys no doubt they will eventually evolve into something that allows them to escape!