General Discussion

12053 readers

216 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.

🪆 About Lemmy World

🧭 Finding Communities

Feel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!

💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:

!actual_discussion@lemmy.ca - Note this is for more serious discussions.
!casualconversation@lemm.ee - The opposite of the above, for more laidback chat!
!letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk - Into video games? Here's a place to discuss them!
!movies@lemm.ee - Watched a movie and wanna talk to others about it? Here's a place to do so!
!politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - Want to talk politics apart from political news? Here's a community for that!

Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.

0. See: Rules for Users.

No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
No Ads/Spamming.
No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Jessica@lemmy.world

ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world

fubo@lemmy.world

Can a sentence be both true and false in the same sense? - Dialetheism (mastodon.social)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by jlou@mastodon.social to c/general@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can a sentence be both true and false in the same sense? - Dialetheism

It might seem nonsensical until one sees the liar's paradox:

This sentence is false.

Using classical logic, this sentence seems to be both true and false. Due to the explosion rule, that implies every sentence. This is absurd, but philosophers don't agree on what has gone wrong here.

Dialetheism is the solution that accepts that it is both true and false and modifies logic to exclude the principle of explosion

@general

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not a logical issue because the sentence itself is nonsense. There's no information in it and isn't proper English. If you have to break a language to invent a paradox, then it likely isn't worthy of consideration to begin with.

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is information in it. Namely, that it itself is false. It is fully grammatical. Similar sentence are obviously valid such as:

This sentence has five words.

That is a true valid grammatical sentence.

I didn't invent the paradox. Philosophers have been contemplating this paradox for a long time.

The problem it gestures at is very deep and similar paradoxes showed up in the foundations of mathematics in the 20th century. It can't be dismissed easily.

@general

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The sentence refers to a fact that can be true or false, but doesn't refer to any fact in and of itself. Nobody would ever use this sentence outside of grading papers. So the one sentence is grammatically incorrect because it refers to nothing. It's a waste of thought.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing you said is true.

Nonsense. False.
No information. False.
Improper English. False.

This is a very well known sentence that leads to things like Gödel's Incompleteness Theoreom.

If you don't enjoy the philosophy of logic, that's fine, but don't go saying a very famous sentence is improper English.