this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
715 points (98.9% liked)

196

16488 readers
1732 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 122 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 62 points 3 weeks ago

literally is objectively correct in this context

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 25 points 3 weeks ago
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] syreus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the secondary, new-age definition of "literally" yes that's true.

We lost the war for "literally". It's now just an emphasis word. The definition is mind bending:

1)in a literal manner or sense; exactly.

2)informal; used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.

On the bright side less people use "absolutely" incorrectly than before.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, but where in the image do you see someone acknowledge the existence of Threads?

[–] Voltage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's the same number on every Instagram profile

[–] Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i haven't heard of anyone actually using it, but I've heard of people using the others

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

... MILF Messenger?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago