this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
847 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9682 readers
1260 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

While it looks nicer, the rent has doubled here

[–] cramola@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rent has doubled everywhere in the past few years. Real estate industry is to blame

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes and no. Yes because fuck big corps that buy houses and set rent price to achieve fill factor of 0.7, no because very these corps buy cheap dirty houses, renovate them, and double the rent.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I bet you don't live in Paris or even France.

There is a lock on rent in heated housing markets for example. Not everything in the US is the same on this side of the pond.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If only.

I live in Portugal which has a similar massive house price bubble, especially in the main cities of Lisbon and Porto, and the "investors", foreign or otherwise, seldom buy run down places to renovate, much less actually build anything: there's no need to do it when the market is so tight and the bubble so massive that merelly buying anything and sitting on it (not even rent it) will yield you 14% a year, and way more than that if you AirBnB them (realestate "investors" don't put their houses in the normal rental market when they can make 4x as much from short term lets to turists).

What you describe might've happenned back when prices were just slowly trickling up and there was no "make money fast" scheme of turning habitation spaces into mini-hotels so "investors" had to actually activelly add value to the dwellings they bought in order to extract a better profit, but nowadays thanks to most governments doing all that they can take to pump up house prices - as it makes GDP figures go up plus most top politicians are at the right wealth level to themselves be housing "investors" - simple ownership of such assets yields great returns without lifiting a finger and in touristic places renting them via AirBnB can double or triple that yield with litterally no more investment than having the place painted and adding some IKEA furniture with no need for paying for and spending time in proper renovations.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So: keep cities horrible so that the rent stays low. Got it.

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Keep that tourism money at home! Our local restaurants can get fucked!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You see, politicians are all just impotent victims and there is nothing at all they can do to control rents and cool down house price bubbles and their inaction (or even actions that help stoke the prices up) have nothing to do with them putting first and foremost the further enrichment of those who have the most riches /s

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think your statment here is actual in reverse of what you may want to point out.

An increase in rent shows a induced demand for the property. More people are wanting to live in this location, thus the rents have gone up because of this demand. The rent did not go up because of the cost of installing those trees, but because the trees are there.

Similarly homes located near public parks, schools, hospitals, or transit may have a higher price tag because more people want said properties.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In London you can literally spot where the subway stations are from a map of rent prices since prices within an area go up the closer a place is to the tube.

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An increase in rent shows a induced demand for the property.

Nope. Increase in rent shows the pumped up scarcity.

More people are wanting to live in this location, thus the rents have gone up because of this demand.

Again nope. You are spreading propaganda without knowing it. Rent is driven by rental algorithms like Yardi and Realpage. Supply and demand do not work if the property is in the hands of few that calculate their prices using the same database and the same algorithms.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You mean shitty places with no amenities rent for the same as desirable locations because of algorithms? TIL

[–] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

No, they renovate it to increase the property class, rent cost for this one, and rent prices overall

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago

The rent would have doubled anyway. Paris is Paris.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 month ago

Due to reno or price gouging?

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

nature is a costly amenity