this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
577 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59347 readers
5007 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You could just stay on the biggest mastadon instance and not care about anything. Wouldn't be too different than just using bluesky.

Preferring handcuffs because it's more seemless sounds like a terrible mindset

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Preferring handcuffs because it’s more seemless

They're not handcuffs. You can always log off.

But the big appeal of BlueSky is the initialization of the interface. It defaults you to "Following" rather than "Discover" and isn't jamming a ton of ads in your feed. There's basically no algorithm. Its a very basic service, rather than an engineered mess. More akin to Facebook or Twitter from back in the '00s, before monetization ruined them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

the big appeal of BlueSky is the initialization of the interface. It defaults you to "Following" rather than "Discover" and isn't jamming a ton of ads in your feed. There's basically no algorithm. Its a very basic service, rather than an engineered mess. More akin to Facebook or Twitter from back in the '00s, before monetization ruined them.

The big appeal of bluesky is that it is in the early stages of monetization that hinges on effectively enclosing a commons so that everybody chooses the product and everything else effectively dies off. The next stage will come, which is when the enshittification happens.

Do we honestly believe there won't be enshittification because the priorities of the current development in the near future is focused on benefiting users?

...or to put it another way, do you set a mouse trap with food a mouse finds miserable to eat? Do you think that first bite of cheese accurately depicts the reality about to unfold?

Here is some more food for thought, given the fact that large western social media corporations and the investors behind them have the equivalent power and cash of small nation states... why all of a sudden the interest now? If Bluesky is a genuine vision of the future why did all these prestigious, highly paid people with more power and R&D resources at their disposal than any of us could hope to ever have...show up AFTER the fediverse already did the R&D, created the vision and took the impossibly hard step of breaking ground and fighting up hill against the network effect and a generally dismissive tech press?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Everything you just said is also true of mastodon.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Mastodon doesn't have a single aggregated community. It's fractured, such that joining one instance doesn't guarantee access to another user's content easily.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is the same not true of Lemmy?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes. And just like with Mastodon, Lemmy doesn't have anywhere close to Bluesky's use base

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I didn't know Mastadon monetizes