this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
215 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2708 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The bottom of the article links to the history (individual features) of other IM programs from that era as well like ICQ and Yahoo Messenger.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Anyone remember the short-lived Great War of the Messenger Apps? For a few months back around... '98? '99? MSN tried really hard to shoehorn its way into working with AIM. About every day there would be an update from MSM Messenger to allow it to work with AIM. Then AOL would fuck with their own protocol to ice out MSN users again.

I think these shenanigans also impacted the Trillium Messenger app too, which up until then had been flying under the radar of messenger interoperability.

I might be getting some of these details wrong.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

And then Jabber came to fix it by introducing an open protocol, and Google started supporting it, and all was well. But when everybody was using Google Chat they severed the Jabber compatibility, locking everyone in to their platform. Now we're back wading around in enshittified shit and Jabber is dead.

[–] TarantulaFudge@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Support matrix!! It already has international support, just needs to be a bit better with stickers and qol stuff. I've been using it for years. It's nice to know I don't have to worry about my privacy at all with chat rooms that can continue on without the original server.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

It was promoted to me as a contender for Slack / IRC, not for the kind of direct messaging app that ICQ / MSN messenger was.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't say jabber is dead, xmpp is still pretty well used. Not enough IMO, but still in use and with readily available modern servers. Jitsi is xmpp+jingle (sip signalling) after all.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People blame Google for the death of jabber because of one blog post from a disgruntled contributor but the truth is jabber was never popular and Google chat died as well.

Jabber was a mess, most of the clients were barely compatible with Each other and it was a wild west of feature support. Some clients were well featured with the ability to send richer messages, but typically only worked with a specific server and the same clients. Jabber did a crap job at making sure clients and servers interacted properly with each other and didn't push the standards quickly enough, forcing clients to do their own thing.

Which is all Google did, they went their own way because nobody used jabber and the interoperability was causing more harm than good. It didn't work, Google talk died and many years later clients like WhatsApp took over instead.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

facebook, google talk, etc. all relied on the XMPP protocol. you could add your facebook messenger friends to google talk or any of the open source clients like pidgin. it was the holy era of instant messaging. federated. solution. no bullshit lockdown to a specific system like in the days of ICQ, Skype, etc.

then both facebook and google talk locked down their XMPP server and i lost 80% of my friendlist on XMPP. and that was that. i had to get facebook. i had to get google mail. especially relevant when microsoft bought skype and it turned to shit.

guess what. today we're split on even more clients than we used to be. need signal, whatsapp, facebook messenger, telegram, discord, band, matrix, threema, session, irc, slack, and steam chat installed on my fucking device. and all because meta and google pulled the rug to isolate their systems and force user conversion.

no, thanks. open source federation is the only solution to unshitification and that's never going to happen as long as people do shit like leaving x for bluesky instead of mastodon etc. leaving facebook for band instead of literally any other fediverse platform (because facebook has devolved to ads and facebook groups - everything else is irrelevant or dead on there). etc etc.

[–] projectmoon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Have you tried Matrix?

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used that until they pay walled it. Then I found Pidgen I believe it was called. It was open source and could connect to pretty much every messenger and IRC and stuff. Then my friend just switched to texting lol

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pidgin. Before that it was called Gaim.
It still works, as there are plugins to integrate it with almost everything.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

Gaim was the way I used MSN from Linux back in the day.

I miss that era.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I knew it wasn't spelled exactly like the bird lol. But yeah I used that shit for years. I don't really have a use for it anymore or I'd probably still be using it

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I used it all the way up until Google broke compatibility with it, then continued using it with a third party plug-in until that stopped being maintained.

Now I prefer Signal over Chat.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"A pidgin /ˈpɪdʒɪn/, or pidgin language, is a grammatically simplified means of communication that develops between two or more groups of people that do not have a language in common: typically, its vocabulary and grammar are limited and often drawn from several languages."

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh that's cool. I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing!

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Always thought it was a great name choice.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Trillium

Trillian, not trillium. And they're actually still around.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Trillian was definitely part of that war. I remember the daily patches to get things working again.

[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

I think the article mentions it. AOL tried to block it and this to and fro went 21 times before finally coming to a stop. MSN and Yahoo later signed a deal, I think, so that the former will work with latter's contacts properly.