Edit - I changed the phrase "aggressive support to "unambiguous support", as there was some confusion over the intent behind my previous phrasing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CYCLR@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good point! I do think it's important to support trans rights, but I'd be a hypocrite if I said I AGGRESSIVELY support the cause. There's just a lot going on in my life right now, I just want to keep a clear mind, is all.

That being said, I never agree with or accept signs of transphobia.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I mean by aggressively is, without caveats, without "but..."'s, without ambiguity. Your support needs to be clearly on the support side.

You don't need to be an activist. You don't need to be out marching or even commenting on trans stuff, but your opinion on trans folks should be unambiguously on the "support" side of things.

[–] CYCLR@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Oh, that's a much better description. I think I'll stay for longer then, thank you!

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. If someone is ever writing out "I'm an ally, but..." literally nothing good ever follows.

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for replying. I don’t know OPs intent when they said aggressively, but I can’t imagine your description not fitting into some reasonable definitions of allyship. Most people (even queer people) are not hauling themselves to every protest. Calling out transphobia as uncool when seen is as aggressive as anybody needs, imo. I wouldn’t get hung up on the wording.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I don’t know OPs intent when they said aggressively

MILITANT SHITPOSTING

SEIZE THE MEMES OF PRODUCTION