Reddit

I haven't seen a developer of the third party apps complain about there being a price at all, just that the price is too high given how much a user costs reddit itself, and how tight the timeline is given at that price. And yeah he basically just said "well we were gonna do it at some point, so why not now?"

I think the issue is that he's saying that he is "willing to talk" but Christian said many times that he feels he's talking to a brick wall. So how can he feel comfortable having discussions when those discussions might not happen until after he starts getting charged prices that he wants to talk about?

For some reason spez doesn't get that and it's really annoying to see him talk about how they're the only company in town offering free lunch, no one is asking for that.

I think charging to use the API is fine, but it was definitely overpriced to the point that it was obvious they wanted to nuke TPAs. They need all that sweet user data to sell to others, and they can't get to that with TPAs.

Even if you think the pricing is fine, the time window the apps get to make changes is way too short. They kept asking when would we have to start paying, and the answer always been in the distance future. Now they have 30 days to get the funding for a huge amount of users.

I don't think charging for the API is inherently wrong, but they want to charge a ridiculous amount. It should be 1/4th of what it is, or less. The Apollo guy calculated it is 20x more than what the average user makes them, via Reddit's own previously posted user monetization stats.

Monetising API access isn't bad, but at a reasonable rate.

The Snoo Platform hiked the rate up to the unaffordable is just insane.

It at least goes to show, once again, that when building on top of other services, those services can fuck you over at any time, for any reason.