Privacy

32442 readers

844 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Is there any good private messenger at all? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by JustMarkov@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been inspecting this topic quite a lot and I'm a little confused now. So, we have reasons not to use Signal, reasons not to use Matrix, there were also some claims about Session being a fraught. Briar is mostly activists related (not very suitable for daily use), XMPP lacks good clients and suffers from fragmentation of protocol standards implementation, SimpleX is too feature-incomplete (no UnifiedPush support, big battery drain on Android, very decent desktop client without any message sync). I can't say a lot about Threema or Wire, as I'm not very familiar with them.

So, my question is — is there any good private messenger at all? What do you think is the most acceptable option?

EDIT: In addition to my post:

All messengers have their flaws, I'm well aware of that. I was interested in hearing users' opinions regarding these shortcomings, not in finding the perfect messenger. I may have worded my thoughts incorrectly, sorry for that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Matrix is decentralized, self-hostable, anonymous, and has good multi-device support, but hasn't yet moved certain meta-data into the encrypted channel.

yet? do they have plans? I'm (relatively) a fan of their platform because of federation, but I thought that it's not really possible, or at least a very much lot of hard work and even more to change that

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the hardest part is the DNS and federation

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand, could you reword it?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

DNS requires public records and the federation meets sharing information between lots of servers.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't remember the statement in the bug report verbatim, but it indicated that they intend to fix it, which is about what I had previously seen on other issues that they did subsequently fix. I expect it's mainly a matter of prioritizing a long to-do list.

I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't be possible. The protocol is continually evolving, after all, and they already moved message content to an encrypted channel that didn't originally exist. Moving other events into it seems like a perfectly sensible next step in that direction.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't be possible

I was in the impression that the protocol was designed with that in mind that the server can do certain things in response to certain other things happening. I think the room membership management part of the client spec writes about this.

But yeah, this can probably change, especially that they are now doing versioning

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Worth mentioning just in case you're not aware: versioning is present not just on the protocol spec, but on individual rooms. That ought to ease any semantics changes that might be needed.