Technology

60052 readers

2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

651

Men Harassed A Woman In A Driverless Waymo, Trapping Her In Traffic (www.404media.co)

submitted 2 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

363 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If an AI car ever has to make a decision on who dies, the answer should always be "whoever agreed to the terms and conditions before they got in the vehicle".

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

And there it is

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This will never be the case. Because nobody will buy an overpriced "yo, if there's ever any doubt about, like, anything - just put a bullet in my head" machine. So nobody will sell it.

Face it - you have the same thousands of pounds of metal today, and you're the only one making decisions. You (drivers, as a community) have killed before, for selfish reasons: because you don't want to die is the least selfish of them. Other hits include "didn't wanna not get drunk with the homies", "I really needed to answer that text" and "I have 10 minutes till home but the game starts in 5, it's my favorite team, I can make it". And you somehow seem to want non-drivers (passengers of AI cars) to have the same expectation that they will be a victim even when they get a car?

Drivers are so self-centered it's goddamn ridiculous.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

I'm talking about pedestrians, not other drivers.

If autonomous vehicles can't be trusted not to run people over, then they shouldn't be allowed to go above like 20mph in a built up area where there's likely to be people walking about. And frankly neither should human drivers, but good luck not getting them to call it a "war on motorists" if you try.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, drivers are self-centered for checks notes not wanting pedestrians to be hit by self-driving cars

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah man. I'll rephrase:

Drivers are self-centered because:

they are one of the leading causes of death, and they convinced the world their convenience is worth it
they believe that they literally know better than AI and are better suited to have power over life and death
they're out here tryna say passengers of AI cars should sign up to die automatically, when drivers are actually the ones who are today responsible for all deaths by car

I made it easier to understand, hope it helps.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

At present most drivers do know better than most driving AIs